Liquidity Liquidity
Every Where Will There Be a Recovery!!
With the gush of
liquidity from most Central banks around the world, the markets are moving to
new highs without a real recovery in the earnings, will this ever greening of liquidity
help in actual revive or does it just postpone the eventual danger of the collapse
of markets world over.
Policymakers have
chosen to ignore the central issue of debt as they resuscitate activity. Since
2008, total public and private debt in major economies has increased by more
than $60tn to more than $200tn about 300 per cent of global gross domestic
product, an increase of more than 20 percentage points.
Over the past eight years, total debt
growth has slowed but remains well above the corresponding rate of economic
growth. Higher public borrowing to support demand and the financial system has
offset modest debt reductions by businesses and households.
If the average interest rate is 2 per
cent, then a 300 per cent debt to GDP ratio means that the economy needs to
grow at a nominal rate of 6 per cent to cover interest.
Financial markets are now haunted by
rising debt levels which constrain demand, as heavily indebted borrowers and
nations are limited in their ability to increase spending. Debt service
payments transfer income to investors with a lower marginal propensity to
consume. Low interest rates are required to prevent defaults, reducing the
income of savers, forcing additional savings to meet future needs and affecting
the solvency of pension funds and insurance companies.
Policy normalization is difficult
because higher interest rates would create problems for over-extended borrowers
and inflict losses on bond holders. Debt also decreases flexibility and
resilience, making economies vulnerable to shocks.
Attempts to increase growth and inflation
to manage borrowing levels have had limited success. The recovery has been
muted.
Sluggish demand, slowing global
trade, capital flows and demographics, plus lower productivity gains and
political uncertainty are all affecting activity. Meager commodity prices, especially energy, and overcapacity in many industries have kept inflation low.
In the absence of growth and
inflation, the only real alternative is debt forgiveness or default. Savings
designed to finance future needs, such as retirement, are lost.
Additional claims on the state to
cover the shortfall or reduced future expenditure affect economic activity.
Losses to savers trigger a sharp contraction of economic activity. Significant
write downs create crises for banks and pension funds. Governments need to
inject capital into banks to maintain the payment and financial system’s
integrity.
Unable to grow, inflate, default or
restructure their way out of debt, policymakers are trying to reduce borrowings
by stealth. Official rates are below the true inflation rate so over-indebted
borrowers to maintain sustainability high levels of debt. In Europe and Japan,
disinflation requires implementation of negative interest rate policy, which
entails an explicit reduction in the nominal face value of debt.
Debt monetisation and artificially
suppressed or negative interest rates are a de -facto tax on holders of money
and sovereign debt. It redistributes wealth over time from savers to borrowers
and to the issuer of the currency, feeding social and political discontent as
the Great Depression highlights.
The global economy might have become
be trapped in a quantitative easing forever cycle. A weak economy forces
policymakers to implement expansionary fiscal measures and QE.
If the economy responds, then the
side-effects of QE encourage a withdrawal of the stimulus. Higher interest
rates slow the economy and trigger financial crises, setting off a new round of
the cycle.
If the economy does not respond or
external shocks occur, then there is pressure for additional stimuli, as
policymakers seek to maintain control.
Economist have been very pessimistic
and feel that there is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom
brought about by credit expansion. The point is
only whether the crisis should
come sooner as a result of a voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion,
or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved. Negative
rates are a de facto tax on holders of money and sovereign debt.
- --Farzan Ghadially
No comments:
Post a Comment