Is this the calm before the storm??
With artificial calm being created in the world markets, is it
the calm before the storm and are the markets looking stretched and looking
over priced with the artificial injection of liquidity world over or is this state
here to stay for a longer period??
With the Sensex at ~28,000 and most of the so called markets
pundits being extremely optimistic about the Indian markets and the political
landscape looking slightly positive that market reforms like GST would be passed
very soon, is the time to go all out on equities or have a cautious stance on
the markets is the big questions. With the Indian markets highly dependent on
the liquidity flows from foreign investors, it is imperative to look at the
overall global picture….
While global economic and political developments point to the
possibility of “jump conditions” once deemed improbable, financial markets have
treated their influence as temporary and reversible. This divergence is
understandable in the short run. Longer-term, however, it sets up complex
dynamics that call for investor adaptations.
In the past few weeks, the UK voting to leave the EU and the
setting of record high prices by the US equity and bond markets simultaneously
added to an unusual period for a global system with more than 30 per cent of
its global government debt trading at negative nominal yields.
The sense of fluidity intensifies when you add to the mix
fragile Italian banks, an attempted coup in Turkey, and tragic illustrations of
vulnerability to lone wolf attacks.
These issues share a potential for fueling so-called jump
conditions in which there is a leap to a different set of circumstances, rather
than a smooth and incremental evolution. They could change longstanding
economic and financial relationships, affect the way economic agents interact
with each other, fuel political anomalies and, in the case of unusual asset
class correlations and valuations, undermine some of the institutions and basic
tenets of the capitalist system.
This phenomenon is not limited to the past and present. Also,
there are potential jump conditions on the horizon which are as follows;
The October referendum in Italy could complicate European
politics already challenged by the legacy of the financial crisis, migration
questions and Brexit.
The US faces its own unusual election in November. China’s
ongoing political changes coincide with its leaders having to manage a middle
income development transition rendered more difficult by international economic
headwinds and domestic financial bubbles.
Meanwhile, unease about policy effectiveness grows in a world
that has been over-reliant on central banks and that will probably see three of
these systemically important institutions (the Bank of Japan, the European
Central Bank and the People’s Bank of China) pulled even-deeper into the
uncharted waters of monetary policy experimentation.
But measures of market sentiment have been remarkably calm. Just
look at the Vix, the so-called “fear index” that captures the extent to which
investors are unsettled by uncertainties. Spikes have been infrequent and
quickly reversed. Its most distinguishing feature is that of overall stability
at subdued levels.
There are good reasons for this. Liquidity injections, both
actual and expected remain ample on account of central bank stimulus and
corporate cash being recycled back into markets via share buybacks, mergers and
acquisitions. Investors have been conditioned by years in which “buy on dips”
approaches have repeatedly proven profitable, especially in markets recently
achieving new highs.
Few investors have rushed to reflect the reality of elevated
prices and unstable asset class correlations back into their strategic asset
allocation, particularly given unchanged investment objectives.
Lacking attractive alternatives, and with limits on how much
cash traditional investment managers can hold, equities continue to attract a
disproportionately large allocation.
It is understandable for markets to trade on the current reality
of cash flow and put aside the possible consequences of the gap between
investor behavior and a growing list of unusual economic and political
uncertainties. In the process, however, a cocktail is brewing that risks future
financial volatility and jump conditions in various market segments.
Investors should look at more of a barbelled approach that
combines higher cash allocations with greater exposure to alternatives; become
more tactical and using scenario analyses, prepare stakeholders for unsettling
volatility down the road.
The biggest mistake for investors is to believe that this period
of artificial market calm is destined, in itself, to lift the fundamentals that
ultimately determine asset value. The opposite is, unfortunately, more likely.
_ Farzan Ghadially.
No comments:
Post a Comment